{"id":34425,"date":"2023-08-01T04:38:06","date_gmt":"2023-08-01T08:38:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/outlawpsych.com\/outlawpsych\/?p=34425"},"modified":"2023-08-01T04:38:06","modified_gmt":"2023-08-01T08:38:06","slug":"observations-on-politics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/outlawpsych.com\/outlawpsych\/observations-on-politics\/","title":{"rendered":"Observations on Politics"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

“They’re fighters, so they say, for Freedom’s rights\/More closely scanned, it’s slave with slave who fights<\/em>.” — Goethe<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The political landscape has changed since Jung shared his observations in 1957. Religious values, however rudely conceived, seem to appeal only to a fast-shrinking minority whose leadership is increasingly irrelevant today (except when useful to image-seeking politicians). But, the facts of nature that science would educate us to are no more incorporated or adhered to than were the religious ideals of two thousand years ago.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The compensations for the repression of the soul, the reality of the individual, are relentlessly squeezed into biased and impersonal ideologies at best: the only emotional harbor for the mass social units under the direction of those manipulating them for their own ends. But, as Jung wrote:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe rulers\u2026 are just as much social units as the ruled\u2026 distinguished only by the fact that they are specialized mouthpieces of the State Doctrine. They do not need to be personalities capable of judgment, but thoroughgoing specialists who are unusable outside their line of business. State policy decides what shall be taught and studied.<\/em>\u201c<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Today, rather than, \u201cState policy\u201d, we might say, \u201cmajority ideology\u201d; though those vying for it are so polarized that a single overview can\u2019t describe the conflicting ideas in them. Jung\u2019s observations still apply:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe\u2026 doctrine is for its part manipulated in the name of\u2026 policy by those occupying the highest positions in the government, where all the power is concentrated. Whoever, by election or caprice, gets into one of these positions is subject to no higher authority; he is the\u2026 policy itself and within\u2026 limits\u2026 can proceed at his own discretion\u2026 He is thus the only individual or, at any rate, one of the few\u2026 who could make use of their individuality if only they knew how to differentiate themselves from the\u2026 doctrine.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThey are more likely, however, to be the slaves of their own fictions. Such one-sidedness is always compensated psychologically by unconscious subversive tendencies. Slavery and rebellion are inseparable correlates. Hence, rivalry for power and exaggerated mistrust pervade the entire organism from top to bottom\u2026 To compensate its chaotic formlessness, a mass always produces a \u201cLeader,\u201d who\u2026 becomes the victim of his own inflated ego-consciousness.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Modern conditions may be more complicated<\/a> than George Orwell\u2019s, \u2018Big Brother\u2019<\/em>, once suggested, though their effects are similar. The concentration of power is more diffuse; the \u201cLeader\u201d more a figure-head for those behind the scenes dictating policy through the buying and selling of influence. Mass media and commercial manipulation accomplish the same goals more easily through benign subversion and gas-lighting than threat and intimidation (though these means are also employed). Still, the facts of its unconscious reality will sooner or later be impressed on an inflated ego.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThis development becomes logically unavoidable the moment the individual combines with the mass and thus renders himself obsolete. Apart from the agglomeration of huge masses in which the individual disappears anyway, one of the chief factors responsible for psychological mass-mindedness is scientific rationalism<\/a>, which robs the individual of his foundations and his dignity. As a social unit he has lost his individuality and becomes a mere abstract number in the bureau of statistics. He can only play the role of an interchangeable unit of infinitesimal importance.<\/em>\u201c<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s an historical fact that only the individual\u2019s creative responses to collective conflicts point the way to different perceptions of them. The personal \u201cneuroses\u201d of today are symbolic representations of the conscious psychic functions of tomorrow, and as more and more individuals are forced to confront themselves through them, so they may create a new attitude to the psychological facts of our conditions<\/a>. But:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cLooked at rationally and from outside\u2026 it seems positively absurd to go on talking about the value or meaning of the individual. Indeed, one can hardly imagine how one ever came to endow individual human life with so much dignity when the truth to the contrary is as plain as the palm of your hand\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cUnder these circumstances it is small wonder that individual judgment grows increasingly uncertain of itself and that responsibility is collectivized\u2026 and delegated to a corporate body. In this way the individual becomes more and more a function of society\u2026 whereas, in actual fact, society is nothing more than an abstract idea\u2026 The State<\/em> [the ideology] in particular is turned into a quasi-animate personality from whom everything is expected. In reality it is only a camouflage for those individuals who know how to manipulate it.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A new brand of regressive tribalism is forming today as a reaction to the alienation and atomization of the individual through the distorted collective under-currents which produced it. “Grievance politics” and the most transparent negative projections onto political opponents now characterize party affiliations. So over-fervent are the participants in their beliefs that even the most glaring hypocrisies are accepted and pursued without question.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As is generally the case with such “true believers”, the problems lie on a deeper level than the surface issues would suggest. Individual complexes <\/a>are psychological facts that can’t be altered by collective processes — and when enough of them gravitate together through their similar dissatisfactions, a minority ideology accumulates and begins to clamor for attention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It appears that the atomized and alienated individual of today is drawn toward tribalized groups more obsessed with similarly-minded dissatisfactions than with common ideology — a broadening of vague ideological tendencies based more on grievance than ideal. This is the definition of the projection of the shadow — and the only means by which it may be recognized and incorporated into consciousness. But, this recognition can only occur with reflection and self-examination by the individual.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Leave a Comment<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Filed under Psychology<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tagged as mass media and commercial manipulation<\/a>, psychological mass-mindedness<\/a>, the conscious psychic functions of tomorrow<\/a>, the facts of nature and religious ideals<\/a>, the facts of unconscious reality<\/a>, the individual’s relation to culture<\/a>, the reality of the individual<\/a>, unconscious subversive tendencies<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“They’re fighters, so they say, for Freedom’s rights\/More closely scanned, it’s slave with slave who fights.” — Goethe The political landscape has changed since Jung shared his observations in 1957. Religious values, however rudely conceived, seem to appeal only to … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34425","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-psychology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/outlawpsych.com\/outlawpsych\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34425","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/outlawpsych.com\/outlawpsych\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/outlawpsych.com\/outlawpsych\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/outlawpsych.com\/outlawpsych\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/outlawpsych.com\/outlawpsych\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34425"}],"version-history":[{"count":34,"href":"https:\/\/outlawpsych.com\/outlawpsych\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34425\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":34734,"href":"https:\/\/outlawpsych.com\/outlawpsych\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34425\/revisions\/34734"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/outlawpsych.com\/outlawpsych\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34425"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/outlawpsych.com\/outlawpsych\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34425"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/outlawpsych.com\/outlawpsych\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34425"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}